Tools
required:
Soft face
hammer, screw driver, socket set, ring spanners, power bar, T bar set and PPE
(Safety boots, safety glasses and overalls)
Following
the manufactures workbook we dismantled the block assembly taking measurements
of internal components.
1. The first component we took
measurements off was the piston. We removed the two compression rings and the
oil ring from each piston. Stacking them in the same order as they were removed
from the groves. We measured each piston diameter with a micro meter, the specification
was 77.954 - 77.974 which only piston two failed
2. We then measured the cylinder
bore, looking for any scoring, scuffing and damage. Each cylinder showed signs
that is has be recently honed and none had any damage. Cylinder two had some
minor scoring. The Diameter, Taper limit and Ovality limit. Cylinder one, two
and four had 0.01mm of taper and 0.02mm of ovality which failed according to
the manufactures specs. Cylinder three was the only one with the measurements
inside manufactures specifications
3. Next was the Piston clearance. We
used previous measurements we took to work out the piston to cylinder
clearance. Largest bore diameter - piston skirt diameter = Piston to cylinder
clearance. Our results were 0.05mm for Cylinder one, 0.28mm for two, 0.06mm for
three and 0.06mm for four.
4. We the visually checked the piston
rings for damage, wear and breakage. The only bad ring was the Oil ring in
cylinder one and the second ring in oil three
5. The piston ring side clearance
was then checked. the top ring clearance was .0015 in each piston which was a
pass with the manufactures specifications. The second ring side clearance was
0.0015 in cylinder one and two, and less than .0015 in cylinder three. Cylinder
four had a side clearance of over .0015mm.
6. Then it was the piston ring end
gap. The top ring end clearance failed in cylinder one and two with a reading
of only 0.3mm and cylinder three and four passed with 0.2mm and 0.23mm. for the
second ring end clearance each cylinder passed with a reading 0.3mm, 0.3mm,
0.279mm and 0.279mm
7. We also inspected the connecting
rods for bed/twist. We didn’t test the rods from our block but instead used
ones that were already apart. Each rod was well above the .04mm specification
with bend and twist as we were getting between 0.152 - 2.946. These rods failed
and are not serviceable
8. The crankshaft was inspected for
damage/scoring. Ours had very slight wear but no signs of damage.
9. We then measured the crankshaft
journals for taper, ovality and wear using a micrometer. Our main journals were
standard and in very good condition with minimal amount of taper (0.002mm -
0.006mm) ovality (0.002mm - 0.013mm) Wear (0.0038mm - 0.008mm) which was all
within specification. Our big end journals were also in very good condition and
were serviceable all under the 0.05mm specification.
10. Our crankshaft deflection was
measured using a DTI gauge set up on v blocks and was 0.015mm which was in
specification.
11. We then made sure our cylinder
block had no cracks, corrosion or damage which it didn’t. We measured the block
face distortion which was bellow 0.152mm as that was the smallest feeler gauge
we had available
12. Our rotary type oil pump was
checked for damage and measured for the following: Side clearance, Rotor tip
clearance, Outer rotor clearance. We used a feeler gauge for each and found
they were all in specification so our oil pump was serviceable.
No comments:
Post a Comment